bubblesak47
Novice
Posts : 32
Join date : 2009-12-15
Location : massachusetts; USA!!!!!!
 |  Subject: pentagon attacks Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:39 pm | |
| a missile hit the side. thats why there is no debris around the blown up part | |
|
Equaliser
Newbie
Posts : 5
Join date : 2009-12-16
Location : Behind YOU!!!
| | Subject: Re: pentagon attacks Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:19 pm | |
|  No no no, there was no missile, it was a plane. The debris were inside the building, some of which was consumed by the resultant fire. The security video at ground level does not show the plane enter due to the slow capture of the camera. If it had been faster reacting then a partial picture of the plane as it entered the Pentagon would have been caught! | |
|
sundia
Novice
Posts : 43
Join date : 2009-12-15
Location : Kent
| | Subject: Re: pentagon attacks Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:27 pm | |
| there is footage of this that is in the militrys hands that no one has seen apparantly  | |
|
The_Hunter
Admin
Posts : 59
Join date : 2009-12-14
Location : United Kingdom
| | Subject: Re: pentagon attacks Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:29 pm | |
| How do we know there is footage if nobody has seen it ?  | |
|
sundia
Novice
Posts : 43
Join date : 2009-12-15
Location : Kent
| | Subject: Re: pentagon attacks Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:30 pm | |
| some one who was working there kinda leaked it out i think | |
|
bubblesak47
Novice
Posts : 32
Join date : 2009-12-15
Location : massachusetts; USA!!!!!!
| | Subject: Re: pentagon attacks Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:26 pm | |
| but there is no debris on the ground outside. a plane hitting a buiding would have left some deris on the outside. the hole in the wall was bigger than a 747. there were also no wing holes in the walls | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: pentagon attacks | |
| |
|
